|
||||||
| View Poll Results: Which lens do you prefer? | |||
| Lens One |
   
|
2 | 33.33% |
| Lens Two |
  
|
4 | 66.67% |
| Neither |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| They are both very similar - too hard to choose |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| Log-in/register to unlock all the member quick-links and features! |
 |
 Senior Member
 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South East
Posts: 1,753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azz
So tell us then.. which ones were they? 
Lens One - Canon 17-40 L f4
Lens Two - Canon 10-22 f3.5-f4.5
As the first one is a L lens it should have superior optics, however the 10-22 is reported to have very good optics (depending who you believe, it is said to be comparable to some of the lower end L's) and EF-S lenses are never given the L suffix
I want a WA/UWA to complement my current set up. The 10-22 covers a range I do not yet have, where as the 17-40 overlaps some of the range of my 28-135. If the optics were far superior then I was going to use the 17-40 as a walkabout lens, but I have always been sorely tempted by the UWA.
Thanks to all who voted
|
Kit 1 Canon 20D Canon 28-135 3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM Canon 100 2.8 USM Macro Canon 10-22mm 3.5-4.5 Canon 50mm 1.4 Canon 85mm 1.8 |
Other Kit View my profile to see my other kit! |
|
My Compact/P&S: Canon Ixus V3 |